Their Work Is Child's Play
An interview with Roger Hart and Selim Iltus of Children's Environments Research Group at City University of New York (CUNY). Hart and Iltus have done extensive research into play and components of successful play environments that can be incorporated into today's parks and playgrounds. From Park Talk, the newsletter of the Urban Parks Institute.
Could you give us your opinion about the state of the art of play today in the United States and our ability to provide good play environments?
First of all, while it's clear that the social issues which impact parks
are different than they were 20 years ago and
there is a lot of debate about welfare reform and
workfare, no one talks about how these issues
affect children. For example, when people talk
about crime and crime reduction, they need to
also discuss how play and playgrounds fit into
crime prevention. It's amazing that at the
same time that crime has increased, recreation
funding has gone down.
If people in this country want
to be serious about creating safe spaces for
young people's development, they have to
increase play area staffing, and they've got
to stop talking about play equipment as a
solution. We'd even go so far as to say that
if we had spaces that were almost
undifferentiated, without play equipment, but
they had two play leaders in them, we'd have
much better programs in this country.
We feel that as parks
departments' resources have dwindled, and
the private sector is stepping in to meet
people's recreational needs, new roles for
government are required. Government has an
overseeing role to play that private companies
will not provide. Parks departments as the
responsible public agency now need to monitor
issues of equity in provision much more than they
have in the past. If we are to rely on
corporations, the private world and people's
ability to write proposals as the way to create
public space and play opportunities, then some
communities will wind up being much better served
than others. City-wide research on access to
recreational resources by different social
classes and groups should become a new division
of a responsible parks department during this era
of privatization.
The second new thing parks
departments need to do is provide technical
assistance to communities, particularly
low-income ones, on how to establish their own
play schemes close to their homes.
What do you think the
reason is that adequate play opportunities are
not being developed?
The first problem is that play
is not really top on anybody's agenda. The
middle class have responded to the crisis of safe
public play provision by buying all kinds of
private alternatives: "pay-for-play"
centers, children's museums, private gym
clubs, after-school classes, etc. They are not
making demands for public play spaces as much.
The poor usually do not know how to make such
demands. Also, no one has taken an overall look
at coordinating play provision. For example,
agencies that deal with child development
generally don't have anything to do with
parks departments. And neither agency thinks they
have anything to do with schools. Each agency
reaches one aspect of children's needs. But
there is likely to be overlap; and certainly
there are gaps. If all of the agencies were more
aware of what each other was doing and who
provides what service, together they could
address children's needs in a more
significant way.
An additional problem in
providing good public play environments, as we
all know, is the fear of lawsuits. This is
something we've been thinking about as part
of our work in community gardens. In community
gardens, we design play areas that do not include
play equipment for active gross-motor play, such
as swings, slides and climbing frames, where
injuries can occur. These play areas tend to
satisfy equally important types of activities for
children even though they are more sedentary.
They include social play, construction play,
sensory play and of course, gardening, Facilities
such as playhouses, sand tables, benches, easel
chalkboards, planting beds and toolsheds not only
enable the kinds of play most compatible with the
quiet retreat-like qualities of community
gardens, but also are the types of activities
that are frequently missing from the lives of
poor inner-city children.
Given the limited public
understanding of the term "play,",
there may be a benefit in using the words
"children's area" rather than
"play area". If you say there is a
"play area" available, parents might
tend to think: "Oh there's a playground
at the community garden... Great, let's
go let the kids work out, swing and climb..." However, if you called it a
"children's area," people don't have the same expectations. To us, construction play, sensory play, social play and the like are valuable components of play, and we would love to improve the public's general recognition of this.
How would you see the idea
of developing play opportunities in conjunction
with other facilities and institutions spreading?
For not very much money,
community gardens could have the kinds of play
opportunities described above established in
areas of urban parks located near child-care
centers, and they could be natural parts of all
schoolyards, especially at schools with preschool
programs. Improving schoolyards is something
that's really taking off in this country,
under great influence from Europe. The movement
began in the United Kingdom as an initiative of
the central government. An inspector for the
Department of Education and Science had the
insight to establish a program called
"Learning through Landscapes" to look
critically at the existing uses of schoolyards.
As a result of this program, a national
non-profit organization was established whose
staff goes all over the country working with
schools. Teachers have the children themselves
evaluate their own schoolyards and the way they
are used (both by kids as well as by wildlife) as
a first step in transforming them into rich
places for play. Creative additions to urban
schoolyards that have come out of the program
include secret gardens, story-teller's
chairs and ceramic murals. There is a central
belief in this program that free play in natural
settings is a superior way to foster an affection
for the natural world.
You spoke earlier about
play leaders, that even a relatively bare or
vacant lot, if it had play leaders in it, would
be a great play environment. What is it that play
leaders provide?
Play leaders facilitate play in
amazing ways, setting the stage for children to
create their own play. They supply loose parts.
Stationary playground equipment, designed for
only one type of play, can never be as creative a
spur to play as a pile of wood, old wheels and so
on. Play leaders can introduce natural and
manipulable elements to parks, since in their
supervisory capacity they can offer a combination
of protection of the site, arbitration of
occasional conflicts and even the provision of
tools. "Adventure playgrounds," found
in North European countries, are usually for
children over 8 years of age, but at a recent one
in a Tokyo park, play leaders have pre-school
children building mud dams, making fires and
creating structures with the leaders.
We understand that you have
an idea for a national play training institute.
Could you explain what that is?
Yes, we are responding to the
needs of both low-income communities and the
managers of pay-for-play spaces who need their
staff to be trained. Ideally parks departments
would also decide to send their staff to the
institute because in the technical assistance
role we spoke of, they could then train
low-income parents to be play leaders. There
would probably be two levels of people trained at
the institute - one would be low-income parents,
who would be trained to organize their housing
project, to do play schemes at little or no cost
around the building. They would get paid a low
wage, but they'd be close to home, with
their own children. But there's another
level, too, which would be community play
organizers trained in social work, or youth work,
or both, who would know how to help parents go
about the business of setting up play schemes. He
or she would train the local play leaders, give
them technical advice, and help them use local
parks and other open areas as safe play spaces.
Many parks are thinking of creating new play areas. How should they start? What are the first things they should consider?
1. Age Groups
It's important to consider
all age groups, as we're seeing more visits
of entire families to play areas. Within this
space, have special opportunities for
infants/toddlers, pre-school, lower elementary,
and spaces for organized games (like soccer,
volleyball and jump-roping), which the 9 and over
crowd will enjoy.
2. Needs of Girls
The play needs of girls are
often forgotten - also, their freedom to travel
is commonly restricted, further minimizing their
play options. Since it's important to find
out what the kids want in their play area via a
participatory process, talk to the girls
separately at first. We find that young
adolescent girls say very little in a mixed group
unless they have first met as a separate group.
Then have a big discussion together. You'll
find girls like volleyball and basketball; but
they might not want to declare this in front of
their boy peers.
3. Supervised play
Lots of things can happen once
you have supervision. Loose parts create an
interactive play area - and if you have someone
who maintains and supervises the area, the
restrictions of having only traditional play
equipment disappear.
4. Biodiverse Terrain
Play equipment is secondary. Primary is finding or creating a terrain which is topographically diverse and biodiverse, with hills, ravines and a great diversity of vegetation. Play structures can then complement
the terrain, with slides, bridges, tunnels and
climbing opportunities occurring naturally in the
landscape.