Reprinted with permission from Building Together: Investing in Community Infrastructure (National Association of Counties, National Association of Homebuilders, Government Finance Officers Association, and Urban Land Institute).
| FINANCING SOURCE | PROVIDES FUNDS | REPAYMENT | ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES |
| Taxes | Immediately | By all taxpayers immediately | Preserves borrowing capacity; saves interest cost | Funds may be insufficient; may not relate payment to benefits received |
| Special Assessments and Special Districts | Immediately | By assessed customers at time of construction. If bonded, over 10-30 years | Makes funds available immediately; matches payments and benefit | Requires legislative approval; may seriously impact assessed customers |
| User Charges | Immediately | By rate payers immediately | Eliminates need for borrowing or reserves | Impractical for large projects; may make rates erratic from year to year |
| Reserves | In future | By rate payers each year until reserve is adequate | Eliminates need for borrowing; improves financial stability of system | Can be politically difficult; difficult to "protect" reserves for intended use; impractical for large projects |
| Negotiated Exactions or Impact Fees (hookups, systems development or capital fees) | Immediately | By developers or customers immediately | Requires new customers to pay for impacts they place on system | Political problems (viewed as "anti-development"); ineffective where there is little or no growth; affects housing affordability |
| Grants | Immediately | No repayment needed | Source of free money | Reporting and administration may be burdensome, may not be in accordance with county priorities |
| Public-Private Ventures | Varies | By private investors and by taxpayers | Total costs to county government are reduced | Coordination can be complicated and time-consuming |