The space is among the best-used public spaces in the United States. Furthermore there is a sense of community here: an interaction between the habitues of the park that one actually feels that this is the City of Brotherly Love after all. People recognize each other and life here has a comfort and allure that has almost vanished everywhere else in the city and the country. The community's general affluence does help; but there is much more at work here.

By the 1850's a building boom began, and in the second half of the 19th century the Rittenhouse Square neighborhood became the most fashionable residential section of the city, the home of Philadelphia's "Victorian aristocracy." Some of the mansions of that period still survive on the streets facing the square, although most of the grand homes gave way to apartment buildings after 1913.

Rittenhouse Park features plenty of benches, each (it seems) with a personal dedication. This is truly a park beloved to its community - itself a beguiling mix of old money, new money, no money, Penn graduate students, young professionals and professional hobos. There are probably more women than men in the park. Families and their dogs and babies are plentiful in the park between six pm and nine pm. But there are people here at all hours of night and morning too. It is as safe, I think, as Philadelphia can get. This district, being home to many affluent and well-connected individuals, has a strong police presence. Crime has been falling in the city generally, and in this area is not regarded as a major problem. Rittenhouse Park (unlike lots of other places in Philly) is clean. Not just that, but it is a true public gathering place- a great place to sit and savor the offerings of one of the neighborhood's many interesting coffee places and bakeries, read the paper and people-watch.

Access & Linkages: Rittenhouse Park is organic to its surroundings. It is separate from the aggressive hustle and bustle of the Walnut/Chestnut Street shopping areas, and its boundaries are well defined. Yet the park insinuates itself into the heart of these busy streets, separating them from the leafier residences on Locust, Spruce, Delancey and Pine Streets. It is of course accessible by foot, being in the heart of an east coast downtown, and of course by all means of public transport. It is eminently easy to hail a cab from Rittenhouse Park. The park also features some wonderful sculptures and is surrounded by some of the most elegant urban scenery in the United States. The relative compactness of Rittenhouse Park adds to its visual appeal, as does the elegance of its entrances.

Sociability: This is of course a favorite meeting place for Philadelphia residents. The community around it is diverse, albeit predominantly quite affluent - with several of the brownstones on nearby streets and several of the condos in elegant buildings such as the Barclay and 1830 Rittenhouse fetching $1 million or more on the market. However, unlike other cities, Philadelphia never seems intimidatingly posh or overly manicured. There are always plenty of down-to-earth people, of all ethnicities, and the concentration of University of Pennsylvania graduate students in the streets to the West of the park prevents this place from acquiring too much of an air of exclusivity. In any case, the park is the pride of many Philadelphians, I feel.

plop the comments here:

Comments

Rittenhouse Park is breathtaking, partly because of the surrounding architecture and the beautiful horticulture. Plenty of seating, kept up very well, and police on premises.

All spots of the park are used by all ages and races. Plenty of benches to sit, or space on the grass to lie down. Fountain that dogs enjoy taking a dip in. Lots of children playing.

Everyone meets people in Rittenhouse Square - it's a very sociable place where people enjoy themselves.

Accessible to everyone with plenty of entrances on all sides. Everyone uses it whether just passing through or to stay for a while.

-- Olivia Cleaver

While this is a lively and elegant place in a great location, I found the rules of the park to be too restrictive. I actually saw a police officer issue a ticket to a girl simply for riding a bicycle through the park.

-- Matthew Leonard

Rittenhouse is the only square of the 5 original in the City that has not been changed. This is due to a history of public stands that have been taken by its citizens beginning in 1838, to protect the space for what it was meant to be by the founder, an oasis for the urban weary .

-- maryann heinzen

I was pleasantly surprised to find this park in your list. I visited in 2001, and found it to be a great community place - older people sitting together and having a conversation; younger people lying on the grass getting some sun; painters with their canvases, surrounded by curious people; girls walking their dogs. Everyone seemed to be having a good time, and all this is very non-hurried way. I took many pictures.
Mike C (who was involved in a public spaces project with the European Commission)

-- Michael Cytrynowicz

I fell in love with Philadelphia and Rittenhouse Square Park when I went there with my Landscape Architecture studio last semester. My professor challenged me to pick this square for a sketch study and report to him "why it works." I was quite pleased with my discoveries. I captured a picture of two families sharing a bench: one young and one old. At one end of the bench there was a baby in a stroller and at the other end was a grandmother in a wheelchair. This image alone gave several reasons in addition to the location and adjacent land use, the range of seating options, it’s beauty and comfort.

-- lynn jordan

This is without question one of the (if not THE) best urban open spaces in the United States, but the other comments describe the RESULTS of it being a great space (lots of people, lots of diversity, well-kempt, etc.); they haven't really identified what makes it great and yields these results. The answer is complex, just like great cities. It's not that it's green (though that helps) nor that it has beautiful architecture surrounding it (though that helps too).

There are three distinct attributes that make Rittenhouse work. The first, and most important, is that it is exactly positioned at the boundary between a dense residential district and the city's retail and financial district, so that it is constantly being traversed by people moving between the two. (This is probably the main reason the three other squares of the original Philadelphia plan--which lack this locational advantage--don't work as well.) The second is that the buildings surrounding it are in beautiful scale with the width of the square (they feel about as tall as the square is wide, though they're not really), so that they form a "wall" around the square and give it a sense of enclosure, just like a room (all great squares do this, but not many in the US). Third, Paul Cret's masterful plan, which criss-crosses the park with uninterrupted diagonals as well as more circuitous but still geometric paths, beautifully accommodates both the purposeful route of the pedestrian and the leisurely route of the idler, with plenty of spots for the two to interact.

Perhaps just as interesting as what the park has is what it DOESN'T have: no pointless stairs, changes of elevation, waterfalls, berms, bollards or other landscaping histrionics so favored in trying to accessorize American urban spaces. In fact, there are precious few actual landscaping features other than walks, benches, trees, flower beds and a small ornamental pool that sometimes has water in it.

As a final note, I'd argue that the "overly restrictive" aspect mentioned by a previous commenter is a benefit. Riding bicycles on the sidewalk is dangerous for pedestrians, and in fact it's illegal everywhere in Philadelphia. That it's enforced in Rittenhouse makes it one of the few places people afoot are protected from this menace, and residents who see the police so doing gain a sense of confidence about the space that contributes to its ultimate use and liveliness.

-- Alan Razak

I spent the first four years of my life living in 1800 Rittenhouse Square. I remember riding the goat, and feeding the pigeons. My mother would sit for what seemed like hours watching me play and talking with other mothers. My father would take me down with the stale bread and all the pigeons would come flocking to what used to be a circle of dirt across from the goat. Now, although I live on Long Island, I bring my children to Rittenhouse Square, and they ride the goat and feed the birds. My children now have fond memories of playing in "Mom's park in Philadelphia." Rittenhouse Square is one of my best and earliest memories of childhood. I'm glad that it's one thing that hasn't changed!

-- Amy Maza

The park is beautiful with all kinds of beautiful people. I am only sad that I was not allowed to feed those that were hungry.

-- teresa marvel

Back to top

Back to Great Park Places