Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts

At Spruce Street on the Avenue of the Arts (Broad Street), adjacent to the University of the Arts.
Philadelphia, PA

Submitted by: Ethan Kent

Is this 2001 building a downtown gem - or "the first great architectural mistake of the 21st century"?

Click on any image for slide show


For more images of Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts or other places, try searching our Image Collection

Why It Doesn't Work

With its alienating blank walls and uninviting pedestrian entrance, the Kimmel Center is at best an interruption of an otherwise reviving Avenue of the Arts. The brick overhangs and prominent car entrance and loading docks further separate the street and the downtown from anything that goes on inside the building. The goal of the architecture seems to be easing the passage of wealthy suburban patrons into and out of the complex while minimizing their contact with the urban surroundings - but still allowing them to feel like they are participating in civic grandeur. The remarkable glass ceiling aptly punctuates the attempt for the building and its patrons to rise above Philadelphia while separating out and looking down upon the people and places that are quietly creating a great city.

A $265 million 15-year project, most of the money was raised under the auspices that it would be a contribution to its downtown neighborhood. It is quite obvious that the neighborhood had little input into the design of the building and in no way stands to benefit from its architecture or its clientele. It is unfortunate that the slogan of its fundraising department is "creating a landmark and a legacy – together."

What Puts Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts in the Hall of Shame?

The pedestrian entrance - which is no more than the wall bent in - only half-heartedly opens to the street. The walls and sidewalks of the building are poorly lit and have no significant signage. The crossings on Broad and Spruce streets are unnecessarily long and unsafe. The center is very easily accessed by the cars and trucks.

The intimidating blank walls and a total absence of amenity are an insulting break in an otherwise pedestrian friendly avenue. The image of the arts it portrays, if any, is that of elitism and inaccessibility to the masses.

Despite indoor public spaces and restaurants, from the street there seems to be no obvious way to experience the building as a pedestrian unless you pay to go to a concert. Even the fact that it is a concert hall or that anything exciting may be going on inside is not readily apparent.

It seems unlikely that anyone would choose to meet outside and mind waiting for someone outside this facility. Likewise, the possibility that patrons of the center would linger in surrounding public spaces or venture out in to the neighborhood does not seem to exist. Most unfortunately, people from the neighborhood would risk being considered undesirables if found lingering around the building and are likely intimidated to be in its vicinity at all.

History & Background

Excerpted from the Kimmel Center website:

Governor Tom Ridge presented RPAC with a gift of $20 million from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. "Philadelphia’s Regional Performing Arts Center is the very best kind of public-private partnership -- individuals, corporations, foundations and public dollars all coming together to build what will be a spectacular landmark. What a wonderful and exciting time for the arts in Pennsylvania," says Governor Ridge.

Believing strongly that the Center will be instrumental to the continued revitalization of Philadelphia and the regional economy, Mr. Kimmel first pledged $12 million to the project in 1993, then contributed another $3 million in 1998.

The Kimmel Center will seat 3,150:
2,500 in Verizon Hall
650 in the Perelman Theater

The Center's structure and finishing include:
29,054 total cubic yards of concrete (equivalent to 92 miles of 5-foot wide sidewalk)
317,000 masonry blocks
3,700 total tons of structural steel
2,281 tonnage of rebar (reinforcing steel bars)
61,048 linear feet of structural steel tubing supporting the glass roof
1,400 tons of steel in the arches supporting the glass end walls
156,677 square feet (3.6 acres) of glass glazing
66 tons of weights holding glass end walls
9,300 gallons (860,000 square feet) of paint
594 doors
2.5 miles (13,184 linear feet) of handrails
14 elevators
144 bathroom fixtures (86 for women and 58 for men)
135,000 total cubic yards of dirt were removed from the construction site at Broad and Spruce Streets
There are more than 3,900 public parking spaces within three blocks of The Kimmel Center, with an additional 1,000 proposed.

Contact Info:

Phone: 215.790.5800

Related Links:

Back to top of page

User Comments:

> Add your own comment about Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts

05/30/02 Olivia Cleaver said:
I may have to agree here. I lived right around the corner during the early to mid stages of construction, and all I thought was "What kind of a monster are they building here?" I'll take The Academy, small and intimate, any day of the week over the Kimmel Center. It's just a huge complex. Was art supposed to be mass-produced in huge, multi-purpose commercial arenas?
01/24/03 William Foose said:
Rather disappointed, may I tell you why? It isn't very inviting and it is somewhat inconvenient getting to one's seat in Verizon Hall. Those narrow ramps can hardly be considered well designed. I might say here that while I recognize the need to raise funds, I find naming of the hall after a corporate entity somewhat off putting. A building with an off-street plaza-type entrance that would not only lead directly to the concert hall but also to a better located entrance to the parking garage would have been more impressive. No, I never expected to see nor wanted a beau-arts style building, but I do think something more monumental than what we have would have been more in keeping with the Orchestra's world-wide reputation. After all, The Philadelphia Orchestra is the single most important reason, and perhaps the only reason, to consider Philadelphia a World Class City. Inside, both the elevators and rest rooms could have been more conveniently located toward the center of the building. A space I soon expect to see closed up/off is the restaurant in front on the second tier. That space is as ugly and as cold as a waiting room in a large air terminal. That terrible sterile ambience does not support the kind of dinning being offered.
03/31/03 j kilpatrick said:
This ugly place reminds me of a dirty train shed leftover from the Industrial Revolution. It doesn't reflect anything uplifting or edifying from the Arts, and certainly nothing as beautiful visually as the Philadelphia Symphony is musically. It is the first great architectural mistake of the 21st century.
06/02/03 Lee Stoltzfus said:
I whole-heartedly disagree. The Kimmel Center is a stunningly-beautiful celebration of community involvement and civic responsibility. It is a much-loved gift to Philadelphia. The public spaces here represent the best of American Democracy in the Arts.
06/04/03 Maxwell Kardon said:
Everyone so far has neglected to discuss the most important aspect of why the Kimmel Center was built: the acoustics. All of us would have been happy to keep seeing the orchestra in the cozy, personal Academy of Music, but the orchestra was not happy to keep playing there. I have had the pleasure of speaking with the head acoustic technician for the Kimmel Center, and we discussed the months of engineering that went into its construction. Not a single surface in Verizon Hall is flat, and even the fabric on the seats was specially selected to optimize the sound there. When I went to the Kimmel Center in the afternoon there was a chamber music concert right outside Verizon Hall. It was free to enter, and it seemed to me that people of all types and ages were enjoying the music and the immense space in which they rested. The selection of the Kimmel Center for the "Hall of Shame" is in and of itself an elitist choice. Consider the less bourgeois public performance spaces in the Philadelphia Area (Veteran's Stadium, The First Union Center, The Tweeter Center) and you'll find them all much more horrific than the admittedly architecturally disappointing Kimmel Center. It's not the Academy of Music, and it's not the Mann Center, but at least it's not a homogenized, 1970's era monstrosity.
12/06/04 Stephen Wagner said:
I completely disagree with this review. The Kimmel Center has two pedestrian entrances, both quite prominent and inviting. One entrance faces Broad Street, the Avenue of the Arts, and is part of a large of expanse of the glass facade, which allows one to see into the main hall. The other entrance is part of the Spruce Street facade, which is further broken up by the gift and music store. Inside, the building has a large public area where people can gather before or after a concert, although often people merely wander in and out of this space off the street. There is also a great public viewing space nestled on top of one of the theatres, where one can lookout over the city through the glass roof. Frankly, I didn't know one could drive into the building or park there as I have never even noticed a parking entrance. If you wanted a real feel for the building and it's part in the city, go there on a Saturday afternoon when there are free concerts in the main hall and observe the people interacting with this great public space.
06/03/05 Karin Morris said:
I would have to disagree that the Kimmel Center doesn't work as a vital public space/new building. I frequently walk through the Kimmel even when not there for a performance (in fact I've only been once for a paid performance, but several times for free perfomances). I think the ped entrances are easy to find, the gift shop and cafes are open to the public, as is the atrium area, which acts as an internal plaza/street. While I'm not a big fan of Philly's love affair with all things brick, I think the Kimmel is a great addition to Broad Street, and while not perfect, not something to be ashamed of.
08/15/05 Paul Marotta said:
Indeed, Kimmel not a Hall of Shame

I recently became Director of Communications for the Kimmel Center for the Arts and have to say I wholeheartedly and respectfully disagree with Mr. Kent's observations. One of the main reasons I took the job here in Philly, aside from the quality of great presentations that take place on the various hall's stages, is the sheer soaring beauty of the facility. I was awestruck by the scope, imagination, and breathless quality of the architecture of The Kimmel Center. I've worked in many concert halls around the country, both new and old, recently built and recently restored; all had their inherent beauty and connection to their community, as does The Kimmel Center.

And, equally enamored of the Kimmel are many others. Hundreds of thousands of others in fact, on a yearly basis. The numbers are in from last year and concert goers flocked to the facility for performances, by early estimates more than 600,000 in fact. More than 8,300 people took the free 1pm tour. Children came to education related events and programs by the busload, literally. One need only stand out front on performance evening to watch the excitement and anticipation and energy around the anticipation of the first notes resounding from the Kimmel's stages. A brand new $6.4m pipe organ is being built in Verizon Hall and receiving rave reviews, before a single note is even being played on the massive new instrument. The many world class resident performing arts companies are thriving in their new home.

The Kimmel is and has become a true jewel in the crown of Philadelphia. I would invite Mr. Kent to join us on performance evenings so that he too can "catch the fever" that is the Kimmel Center.
Paul Marotta

> Add your own commentabout Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts

Back to top of page