If we are what we eat, do we also design what we experience? / Photo: Mr. T in DC via Flickr

A few years back, I paid a visit to the headquarters of a state DOT, for the purpose of helping to plan its Safe Routes to School program. As DOTs went, this one had a reputation for being fairly amenable toward pedestrians, by which I mean that the department in question considered walking to be a legitimate form of transportation, which was eligible for spending federal transportation dollars. That, of course, doesn’t always seem to be the case.

Returning from lunch (in a car, because we certainly weren’t in a mixed use neighborhood) we encountered a pedestrian about to cross the DOT’s driveway apron. The driver, being both a human being and a law-abiding citizen, yielded to the pedestrian. But the ped stopped and waived us through. We insisted, and after a confused shrug, he proceeded along his right-of-way. Some might read this merely as a courteous interaction between two users of the transportation system. I saw something more sinister: a microcosmic reminder of the hierarchy at play on our nation’s roads, in which the convenience of the driver subordinates all other forms of transportation. I immediately cracked a joke that the yielding pedestrian was probably a traffic engineer. (As it turned out, he was.)

Entering the building I noticed, next to the front door (kudos!), what is to date the saddest, loneliest, and  rustiest specimen of a wheel-bender bike rack that I have ever seen. I was begged not to take a picture of it. (I did anyway, and framed it nicely with the DOT’s name placard above the front door. Sadly, I’ve lost track of the photo…it’s gone to the great digital beyond.) My final reward came at the end of the day when, upon exiting the building into the parking lot, I stepped out onto a raised, textured crosswalk. I joked: this is the only raised crosswalk in the state, and it’s in the DOT’s parking lot! My smirk turned into a grimace when I was informed there was a not-so-funny reason for that particular traffic calming feature being exactly where it was.

I had largely forgotten about this experience until I received a call recently from a reporter who was doing a story on a spate of pedestrian deaths where he lived. As one who aced the state capitals quiz in 7th grade Geography, I immediately recognized the city in question was also that state’s seat of government. After examining the corridor where the deaths occurred—a multi-lane, high-speed, no-median, state road lined with strip retail development—I located the state DOT’s headquarters, which happened to be a 10-second drive from the road in question, at the confluence of an expressway and a sea of parking.

I had to wonder: if we are what we eat, do we also design what we experience? It isn’t hard to imagine that, deep within the bowels of the state DOT, there are people who’ve never ridden transit, who’ve never walked to lunch, who live a suburban lifestyle, who cannot imagine their children walking to school, and who haven’t ridden a bike since they passed their driving test? Should it be a surprise to us that driving is the first thing the engineer or planner thinks about when he or she sits down to review a plan for a bridge, an intersection, a corridor, or a roadway “improvement”?

We decided to have some fun with Walkscore and state DOT headquarters. We found the address for each state headquarters office and found that the average walkability rating for state DOT headquarters offices is a paltry 67.4. As any high school student can tell you, that’s a barely-passing “D” grade. Below is a slideshow of the eight state DOT offices with Walkscores below 50, which the site categorizes as “Car-Dependent.” We’ve ranked them from best (or: least horrible of the worst) to worst. Take a look, and then let us know how well the built environment around a your state’s DOT correlates to its consideration for walking, bicycling, and transit.

UPDATE: You can also click here to download the list of all 50 DOT offices, ranked by Walkscore.

Related posts

  1. Walking is Not a Crime: Questioning the Accident Axiom
  2. Book Review: Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time
  3. Six Big Questions From the Walking and the Life of the City Symposium
  4. Early Bird Registration for Pro Walk / Pro Bike 2012: "Pro Place" is Now Open

Keep your finger on the pulse–sign up for Placemaking News today! subscribe

  • HamTech87

    You can also do the same thing for your municipality’s engineering firms. I live in a town outside NYC, but it has the same density of many cities around the country like Dallas or Portland, Oregon. So we should use an engineering firm that knows “urban”. Fat chance: the walkscore for the firm’s offices is a 27.

  • Frank S

    You should at least give Maryland DOT credit for being less than a half-mile from a commuter rail station and having build a connecting walkway.

  • D.M.

    To give Maryland credit, the main offices of the State Highway Administration are in downtown Baltimore with a Walk Score of 97.

    http://www.walkscore.com/score/707-n-calvert-st-baltimore-md-21202

  • Dave

    67 is not really that bad of a walk score. For anything outside of a downtown it’s tough to break 80. My house is a 58 and I consider it pretty walkable (parks/schools and a few restaurants within 1/2 mile).

  • http://opusthepoet.wordpress.com/ Opus the Poet

    It’s not just the state DOT that’s the problem, there are all kinds of regional planning offices that are surrounded by walking “deserts” that are impassible without a motor vehicle, like my local regional the NCTCOG at the junction of two freeways in the largest city in the country (and maybe the world) without any form of public transit.

  • Boonified

    NCDOT’s headquarters building is in the middle of downtown Raleigh but most workers in the area are warehoused in the cheapest cubefarms in the middle of nowhere that the state can find. Those with offices downtown have subsidized reserved parking but department leadership pays no attention to walkability, bikability, transit access, telecommuting or proximity for everyone else. At some NCDOT offices you’ll see employees who want to stay fit walking circuits through the parking lot because there is literally no place else to go.

  • MC75

    This message should not be understated, b/c I have found in nearly ten years of planning practice (and longer of working) that people’s perceptions, often more so that facts or analysis, shape their professional as well as personal decisions. I have worked with planners who have never functioned in their daily life (work or living) in a mixed-use neighborhood where transit and walking are not only viable but somewhat popular options, and you can immediately see the difference.

    Examples for me come from the world of affordable housing. I’ve worked with affordable housing staff who, even in a smart-growth environment, focus on how many cars the affordable housing clientele can park, and lamenting that if the garage is not attached, the client would have to “carry their groceries.” (When I brought up that in the same city many new houses did not have attached garages, I was told “that’s fine for upper-middle class white professionals, but not for minorities or the working class.” Really??) I was also informed that families with children “can’t use transit” despite this city having a award-winning, safe and attractive transit system. Likewise, I worked in another city where developers could not figure out a good way to fit small-lot affordable (entry-level) single-family homes into their developments. I quickly pinpointed the problem in that the developers insisted “people need a 2-car garage” even though most of the clients in that income range were single-income families …

    These statements were all made by professionals who were seeking to solve affordable housing problems exacerbated by land scarcity … the problem being none of the professionals in question had lived in a walkable community (we all commuted in) and could only understand such as attractive to single, white professionals if to anyone at all …

  • Pingback: How Walkable Is Your State DOT’s Headquarters? | Streetsblog.net

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/thisisbossi/collections/ Bossi

    http://blog.tstc.org/2013/03/28/how-walkable-is-your-state-dot-headquarters/
    To copy/paste my reply over at TSTC:

    While admittedly lacking on walkable lunchtime destinations or happy hour destinations, it’s worth bearing in mind that Maryland DOT’s headquarters is right at a MARC/Amtrak station. Most of the people I know there pack a lunch, commute by MARC, and spend their evenings back home — where their home MARC stations do have more walkable evening destinations.

  • Pingback: DOTs and the Walkin’ Blues | Better Roads

  • Pingback: Cyclelicious » Invisible gorillas, guerrillas for visibility, and more bicycle news

  • http://www.cfpphysiciansgroup.com/our-doctors-staff/ Family Medicine Doctors

    Having fun part in life and real time visionary is another section than believe as
    “What You See is What You Get”

  • Pingback: Cyclelicious » Caltrans Districts and their Walkscores