Vauban, Germany. Photo Credit: Martin Sheck for the New York Times.

Vauban, Germany. Photo Credit: Martin Specht for the New York Times.

Eliminating or heavily restricting cars would be impossible for nearly every city and suburb in America. Yet a small car-free town in Germany profiled in this week’s New York Times has intrigued and inspired Americans to consider a tantalizing possibility: what if we didn’t need cars to perform everyday tasks?

The #1 most emailed article on the Times website (on 5/12) describes Vauban, a small, upscale German town where residents must walk or bike within town limits. The former home of military barracks, Vauban has compact infrastructure that was capable of being retrofitted  to eliminate cars. An efficient public transit link via tram to the nearest city, Freiburg, ensures that residents can commute to work.

Having been built in an era of automobile dominance, very few American communities are endowed with Vauban’s type of infrastucture.  Moreover, public transit is either nonexistent or a less than desirable option for the majority of Americans. Still, much can be done to create more walkable communities and destinations where a car is unnecessary to work, shop or have fun.

Judging by the comments on a fascinating followup post on the NYT “Room for Debate” blog post, which explores what a car-free America might entail, most people are eager for the opportunity to drive less and walk more. Contributors and commentors expanded on the myriad ways already being taken to reduce car dependence across all levels of society, from supporting government initiatives that fund transit to making personal sacrifices.

While a transition to a less car dependent America will not be easy, where there is a will, there is a way. Vauban, and the great interest it has engendered, demonstrates the possibility of creating car free districts and public interest in even imagining the possibility.

Keep your finger on the pulse–sign up for Placemaking News today! subscribe

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M0GyIuxIvY Syed Saiful Alam

    Fuel Consumption and Environmental Impact of Rickshaw Bans in Dhaka

    Most trips in Dhaka are short in distance, usually one to five kilometers. These trips are perfect of Rickshaws. Rickshaws are cheap and popular mode of transport over short distances. Rickshaws are safe, environmentally friendly and do not rely on fossil fuels. Rickshaws support a significant portion of the population, not only the pullers, but also their families in the villages, the mechanics who fix the rickshaws, as well as street hawkers who sell them food. From the raw materials to the finished product the Rickshaw employs some 38 different professions. Action needs to be taken to support the Rickshaw instead of further banning it in Dhaka. The combined profits of all Rickshaws out earn all other passenger transport modes (bus, rail, boats and airlines) combined. In Dhaka alone, Rickshaw pullers combine to earn 20 million taka a month.

    We think that over the coming holiday of Eid du Ajah, new Rickshaw bans will be put into action on roads in Dhaka. Eid was used in the past to place new bans on roads in Dhaka. Last Eid many roads were declared Rickshaw free without public support or approval. By banning Rickshaws roads are clogged with increased private car use as well as increased parking by cars. Banning of Rickshaws on major roads increases the transportation costs for commuters. Not only due to longer trips to avoid roads with bans in effect, but also due to actually having to take more expensive forms of transport such as CNG or Taxi, where in the past a Rickshaw would suffice. The environmental impact of banning Rickshaws is obvious because it exchanges a non-motorized form of transport for a motorized form of transport, thus increasing the pollution and harming the environment. Rickshaw bans harm the most vulnerable in society, mainly the sick, poor, women, children and the elderly; generally those who can not afford or do not feel comfortable on other forms of public transport. To ban Rickshaws also hurts small businesses that rely on them as a cheap and reliable form of transporting their goods. Rickshaws are ideal for urban settings because they can transport a relatively large number of passengers while taking up a small portion of the road. In 1998 the data showed that Rickshaws took up 38% of road space while transporting 54% of passengers in Dhaka . The private cars on the other hand, took up 34% of road space while only transporting 9% of the population (1998 DUTP). This data does not include the parking space on roads that cars take up in Dhaka . If included this would further raise the amount of space taken up by private cars. Every year the Rickshaw saves Bangladesh 100 billion taka in environmental damage.

    The government makes many efforts to reduce traffic congestion in Dhaka but with no success. Blaming Rickshaws for traffic congestion and subsequently banning them from major roads has not had the desired affect. Traffic is still as bad now as it was before the Rickshaws were banned on major roads. Rickshaws thus can not be seen as the major cause of traffic congestion. Instead one should look towards private cars and private car parking on roads as the major cause of traffic congestion. The space gained by banning Rickshaws is often used for private car parking. The current trend in transport planning reduces the mobility of the majority for the convenience of the minority. The next time a ban on Rickshaws on another road is discussed please take into consideration who is being hurt and who is being helped. For a better transport system in Dhaka we need to create a city wide network of Rickshaw lanes. If this is done Dhaka can reduce its fuel usage dramatically as well its pollution. We ask your help in our fight to keep Dhaka a Rickshaw city. Any information or help is very much appreciated and sought after. I write you this letter to describe the difficulties we are facing and some solutions but they are by no means exhaustive and we look forward to your help and input.

    Syed Saiful Alam
    Volunteer of Save The Environment Movement৷
    Email: shovan1209@yahoo.com

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M0GyIuxIvY

    http://dhaka-rickshaw.blogspot.com/2008/08/fuel-consumption-and-environmental_15.html

  • http://www.google.com KrisBelucci

    Hi, cool post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for writing.