David Engwicht

Biography • Perspectives • Quotable • Publications

David Engwicht is one of the world’s most inventive thinkers on creating vibrant public spaces and is the founder of Creative Communities International, an incubator for social innovation which works to build the capacity of citizens and cities to create vibrant neighborhoods, prosperous shopping streets and add magic to the public realm.

An award-winning and prolific author, David is known around the world as a social inventor, artist, and “street philosopher.”  Often hailed as the “traffic calming guru,” he is credited with pioneering the concept of the Walking School Bus and invented the Neighborhood Pace Car.

Although never formally trained as an urban planner, David’s innovative approach to community engagement and revolutionary ideas about traffic management make him a highly sought-after expert in the field.  In fact, his first involvement with the built environment wasn’t until 1987 when he attended a public meeting on plans to upgrade Route 20, a thoroughfare proposed for his home suburb in Brisbane, Australia.  At the time, he was washing windows for a living.  He quickly became appointed to a leadership role in this campaign, known as CART, Citizens Against Route Twenty.  His experiences in this effort informed his bookletTraffic Calming,” which is credited with starting the traffic calming revolution in many parts of the world.

Today, David shares his expertise with towns around the world, energizing and empowering communities to become responsible for their public spaces.

Biography

David is the eldest son of an itinerant gospel preacher. After dropping out of high-school, he trained as a telephone technician.  David has had a wide variety of jobs throughout his life: he worked with young people in Australia as a freelance social worker and later became a furniture craftsman and a marketing manager for a magazine. He considers his lack of formal education and his underprivileged childhood as two of his greatest assets.

A few years after the publication of his booklet “Traffic Calming,” David wrote the book “Reclaiming our Cities and Towns,” as a response to some of the ways cities were implementing the concepts in his first book.   David also traveled the world working as a consultant bringing his Placemaking knowledge to city agencies and communities throughout the UK, Italy, Canada, USA, New Zealand and Australia. In 1992 David was invited to be a member of the CEAD Committee (Community, Environment, Art & Design) of the Australia Council, the Australian Government arts funding body.

In 1994, David partnered with the Brisbane City Council to conduct the first study in the world to make a connections between techniques used for garbage reduction and for traffic reduction.   Inspired by his work with communities around the world, David made an accidental discovery in 1996: the speed of traffic on residential streets is governed, to a large extent, by the degree to which residents have psychologically retreated from their street.   This insight, and many others, became part of a 1999 publication called “Street Reclaiming: Creating Livable Streets and Vibrant Communities,” which proposed that streets be treated not just as corridors but also as places for community building and engine-rooms of robust local economies.

In 2001 David conceived and implemented Red Sneaker Week in Brisbane, Australia – a program that encouraged kids to walk to school. In 2004 David met the late Hans Monderman and subsequently became involved in the Shared Space experiments in Europe.  In 2005 David published “Mental Speed Bumps: the smarter way to tame traffic,” a book that combined his personal experiences with instant street reclaiming with insights he gained from his work in Europe with Hans Monderman.

In 2007 David became the official Place Maker for the City of Wodonga in Victoria, Australia. His main job was to rebuild the main street of a rural city that was known to locals as ‘Struggle Town’.  Today, he travels around the world to meet with city officials and community groups who can benefit from his strategies at social innovation.

Perspectives

Humor: The Secret to Traffic Calming

Known as the “guru of traffic calming,” David advocates for cultural solutions to transportation and congestion challenges.  City agencies and community groups around the world seek out David’s expertise and creative fire to invigorate their public planning process.  His recommendations don’t focus on developing a design or on certain engineering solutions but instead concentrate on ways to use humor and local cultural and social assets to shift away from the obsession with mobility to a new mentality focused on cultivating meaningful, beautiful experiences.

David’s insights include how to use humor to humanize motorists, which can be an effective strategy to diffuse road rage and calm traffic in a way that contributes life and magic to the public realm. Humor encourages motorists to relate to each other as humans.  It encourages drivers to pay more attention and care and decrease the chance for accidents. “Once, I put red devils’ horns on my bike helmet. I didn’t do it with any mission in mind; I just thought it would be fun. Often the responses would catch me by surprise. Kids would have cheesy grins on their faces or someone would pull up behind me and start chatting with me. Suddenly I realized that humor re-humanizes environments that have become dehumanized. That person relates to you as a human instead of an anonymous cyclist.”

The Value of Spontaneous Exchange

David’s teachings also suggest that cities are built for the efficiency of exchange – and represent a major step forward in human evolutionary history. The condensed complexity of urban areas creates the possibility for new encounters and boosts creativity.   In a recent conversation with PPS, David said, “What is the city all about?  The efficiency of exchange.  There are two types of exchange, planned and spontaneous.  For traffic engineers, planned exchanges can be translated as “trips”- this is the only focus of engineers.   Spontaneous exchanges are known as exchanges for free- they don’t cost any more infrastructure- but they are almost impossible to measure.”

Low-Cost Solutions

When thinking about improving public spaces and public life, “money is not the issue.”  Many of David’s recommendations, which are the subject of his latest book, “Mental Speed Bumps,” focus on low-cost tools for traffic problems, community engagement, Placemaking, economic development, and strategies for thinking outside the square.  In his writings and his workshops, David is dedicated to helping cities identify the ‘low hanging fruit’ – the small things that can be done immediately that set off a positive chain reaction with the potential to revitalize entire communities.

The following is an extract from an interview with David and the Bike Walk Twin Cities Program Director, Joan Pasiuk, in which David explains how the consequences of the slow erosion of civic responsibility. These ideas are central to his philosophy.  The full interview text can be found here.

“We’re stuck in a vicious cycle. The city has regulated what used to be citizen responsibility. There was a time when the people could build a building wherever they liked. This resulted in the classic French villas and Italian hill towns whose streets have an organic feel along with organic squares and spaces. The builders of those buildings had a civic responsibility to build in a manner that contributed to the vibrancy of the entire public realm. Now, that civic responsibility has been taken away from the creator of the building and is instead regulated by the city. We rely on the intelligence of one or two public planners rather than the magic and creativity that each individual can bring to the public realm. It’s a total erosion of what used to be citizen responsibilities and has created what I’d call an entitlement attitude. Cities define their residents as customers and start creating a customer-merchant relationship. With that kind of set up, a resident can say, ‘I have my rights –you provide the roads, remove the rubbish and fix the conflicts I have with my neighbors. I pay the money, you give me the product.’ At the same time, without realizing it, those residents are also saying, ‘I’m a disembodied citizen. I no longer belong to a vibrant community; I no longer have a connection to my neighbors.’ The city has taken away their responsibilities, but they’ve also surrendered it. To solve problems, cities need to hand back that responsibility to the residents.

Quotable

Most of the problems we have in our cities are social or cultural problems.  These problems need to be addressed at the cultural level and can’t be solved simply through design.  We have a design-centric view of the world where we assume that every problem can be solved by changing the design of physical space. Our cities have moved from citizenship to entitlement. I’m passionate about design, but design is not what is going to fix the problems. We have to move back to the mind frame where citizens take responsibilities for fixing their own problems.”

“Build a master aspiration- not a master plan.”

“The city is an invention to maximize exchange and minimize travel”

“The speed of traffic on residential streets is governed, to a large extent, by the degree to which residents have retreated from their street.”

“Place Making is like home making. Home making turns a house into a home. Place Making turns a space into a place.”

Publications

Mental Speed Bumps: The Smarter Way to Tame Traffic, 2005

Street Reclaiming: Creating Livable Streets and Vibrant Communities, 1999

Reclaiming our Cities and Towns (also published under the title Towards an Eco-City: Calming the Traffic)

Traffic Calming: The Solution to Route 20 and a New Vision for Brisbane.



Speaking Engagement: Cynthia Nikitin to speak at Imagine Miami Changemaker Conference

Posted by: dkitzes

The second in a three-year series, the Imagine Miami Changemaker Conference II on July 18, 2009 focuses on the power of place. Local residents will learn how to create and sustain the public spaces that build community, from community gardens to family-friendly parks and city blocks. Presented by the Human Services Coalition (HSC), the event will be held in downtown Miami at Miami Dade College’s Wolfson Campus, in the Chapman Conference Center, from 9:30 am – 5:30 pm. To pre-register (deadline July 10), residents can go to www.imaginemiami.org or call (305) 576-5001.

Click here to read more.





June 29th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

Speaking Engagement: Phil Myrick to speak at the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association

Posted by: dkitzes

Phil Myrick will deliver a plenary address at the Texas Chapter of the APA conference in Galveston, TX. The overall theme of this year’s conference will be planning for disaster resiliency. Phil will speak about how placemaking should be a central consideration as Texas communities consider strategies for recovering from desvastation of natural, as well as economic, disasters.

Categories: Blog, Events





June 29th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

Places in the News: June 29, 2009

Posted by: klevy

The latest in urban planning, placemaking, and citizen action:

Categories: Blog, Places in the News





June 25th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

From One-Way Rotary System to Modern Roundabout

Posted by: Aurash Khawarzad

It turns out that roundabouts may be part of the panacea for our greatest traffic woes. Across America, towns and cities of all shapes and sizes have been choosing modern roundabouts over antiquated signalization equipment and expensive grade separated interchanges. The choice of a roundabout, or a modern roundabout, rather, makes sense for several reasons: they have proven to improve the flow of traffic, reduce cost, improve safety, and enhance the quality of place.

The idea of a “one-way rotary system” was first proposed in 1903 for Columbus Circle in New York City by William Phelps Eno, “the father of traffic control.” The Columbus Circle roundabout was built in 1905, and the idea quickly caught on in Western Europe. The first modern roundabouts in the US were installed in Nevada in 1990; but it has been a slow progression, after 104 years we only have about 1000 modern roundabouts in the entire country. France, on the other hand, leads the world with an estimated 15,000 modern roundabouts, and has been building them at a rate of about 1,000 per year.

One of the most touted benefits of modern roundabouts is their ability to improve traffic flow. Studies by Kansas State University have measured traffic flow at intersections before and after conversion to roundabouts. In each case, installing a roundabout led to a 20 percent reduction in delays. The proportion of vehicles that had to stop – just long enough for a gap in traffic – was also reduced. Because of their ability to reduce congestion, the Department of Transportation (DOT) of New York, Arizona, Wisconsin, Washington State, and Oregon, are at some point in the process of developing a modern roundabout program.
It may seem counter-intuitive, but modern roundabouts can actually improve safety while improving the flow of traffic. In March 2000, a report was published by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety entitled A Study of Crash Reductions Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States, which demonstrated that roundabouts reduce crashes by 75 percent at intersections where stop signs or automated signals were previously used for traffic control. According to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), there are several reasons why roundabouts are safe: 1) Low travel speeds – because drivers must yield to traffic before entering a roundabout, they naturally slow down, 2) no red lights to run – roundabouts are designed to keep traffic flowing without requiring vehicles to stop, so the incentive for drivers to speed up to make it through a yellow or red light is removed, and 3) less potential for serious crashes – since vehicles all travel around the center island in the same direction, head-on and left-hand turn (T-bone) collisions are eliminated.
Congestion and safety are often discussed, but what’s not often discussed is the ability of modern roundabouts to greatly improve public space. Increased safety promotes biking and walking, which increases the vibrancy of the place, activates the street, and has several other multiplier effects that can create a destination. Therefore, roundabouts can play important roles in creating a destination, not just an area people drive through.

In many instances, the roundabout itself can become a place. By adding a sculpture, water feature, benches, or other architectural feature that will attract attention, the roundabout can become a community focal point and even a gathering space. When you’re giving directions, meeting friends after work, or walking your dog, you may find yourself heading towards the roundabout. Now, how often have you walked your dog to the grade separated interchange?

Traditional intersections can serve as points of identification for a community, but they do not add to the sense of place. They are often dangerous places that are to be avoided. Modern roundabouts, however, afford opportunities for streets to be places, and allow the community to reclaim intersections as community space.

Below is an image of a Michael Wallwork designed roundabout that PPS proposed for a project in British Columbia. The image is an overlay of our roundabout proposal, on top of a traditional “jug handle” design, which proposes long and wide on and off-ramps. As you can see, the roundabout preserves a significant amount more land than the alternative design. The land preserved by the roundabout includes a park, residential development, and a community arts center; all very important community assets that would be severely compromised if the jug handle were built.

Several areas in the US have fully embraced the modern roundabout. Vail, Colorado was the first; they built a series of 5 roundabouts that eliminated 37 stop signs in the Vail Valley. But it’s the town of Carmel, Indiana that wins the title for implementing the most successful roundabout program. The suburb of Indianapolis has built over 40 modern roundabouts, with several more proposed.

Here is a short video of the Mayor of Carmel presenting the town’s roundabout program. I’ve also included several other links where you can find the roundabout information referenced above.

http://www.carmellink.org/index.php?act=plan1
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_264.pdf
http://www.ksu.edu/roundabouts
http://www.contextsensitivesolutions.org/

Categories: Blog, Building Communities through Transportation, Transportation





June 24th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

GREAT PUBLIC SPACES: Pegram Park (Pegram, TN)

Posted by: Tom Peyton

What: A revitalized park at the heart of a small Tennessee town.

Why it Works: Although Pegram Park is small in size it serves as the center of the community for the town and the surrounding county. It hosts numerous events throughout the year, including 4th of July parades, Christmas in the park, little league, easter egg hunts, political forums and music events. It is what “makes” the town of Pegram, which has grown from a small rural town and has turned into a small bedroom community. The first and foremost issue the community is working toward is safety and accessibility for all. The park is a center for community in a county that has very few community hubs. Community partnerships and volunteers have come together to find funding to upgrade the park and maximize its potential. A non-profit partnership group named Friends of Pegram Park made up of volunteers and citizens have designed a master plan based off of community input, have written grants, are fundraising and are working together with local government to implement the plan. The spirit behind this project has certainly made citizens become more politically involved in a time of change for the area.

Read the entire profile here.

Click here to nominate your favorite public space.

Categories: Blog, Great Public Spaces, Parks





June 22nd, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

Is It Possible to Make Great Public Spaces Today?

Posted by: Craig Raphael

One of PPS's first major projects was adding benches to Rockefeller Center in New York to make it a more attractive as a place to gather.
One of PPS’s first major projects was adding benches to Rockefeller Center in New York to make it a more attractive as a place to gather.

Great public spaces resemble pornography, at least in the way the U.S. Supreme Court defines it: “You know it when you see it.”

Gazing upon alluring spots like the Old Town of Prague, Prospect Park in Brooklyn, or even the courthouse square in a small town, and you naturally think, “I want to hang out there!” You’re attracted to the place and want to be a part of it, watching the people pass by, soaking up the atmosphere.

While it’s easy to identify a great public space, it’s often quite difficult to create a new one today. Many projects setting out to establish a congenial spot for people to congregate — whether a park, shopping district, plaza, waterfront development, civic building, mall, or revitalized downtown — wind up as miserable failures that  feel hostile to very idea of people enjoying themselves there.

William H. Whyte, a noted journalist and mentor to PPS, once observed, “It’s hard to create a place that will not attract people. What’s remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.”

One reason so few truly good public places have been built in recent decades is that urban planning today is pinpointed on specific outcomes— number of vehicles moved on the street per hour, sales revenue per square foot of retail space, or even unimpeachably admirable aims like the number of affordable housing units built. And these myopic goals are ardently pursued at the expense of creating a place that works for the public as a whole.

Development projects today are considered a success to the extent that cars move fast or  cash registers go ka-ching . But they often fail at the equally important mission of creating lively places where people can feel happy hanging out with their fellow citizens. It’s another example of the tragedy of the commons. The value of a public place to the whole community is trumped by the narrow interests of retailers, motorists, etc.

It doesn’t have to be that way. Throughout the world you can find brilliant examples of recently built public spaces that also succeed marvelously as shopping districts (a number of  new developments in already lively downtowns), transportation corridors ( Portland’s new Pearl District trolley line) or affordable housing (public housing projects like Park DuValle in Louisville and Diggs Town in Norfolk, Virginia, that have been transformed into thriving communities).

All that’s needed is a plan that takes into account a place’s broader role as a public spaces alongside other aims.

Categories: Blog, Creating Public Multi-use Destinations





June 22nd, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

Places in the News: June 22, 2009

Posted by: klevy

The latest in urban planning, placemaking, and citizen action:

Categories: Blog, Places in the News





June 18th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

What can you do now to make your neighborhood a better place?

Posted by: joshkent

There are plenty of simple things everyday citizens can do to reenliven their local communities – techniques to engage with your neighbors, revitalize your street, and improve everyone’s quality of life.

Organize an art fair for the kids on your block

Organize an art fair for the kids on your block

It’s easier than you’d think. The Neighbors Project has compiled a set of checklists of simple actions you can take to be more neighborly – from tasks as easy as saying hello to your neighbor, to more involved weekend or seasonal projects, like organizing a block party or community garden. PPS’s own Great Neighborhood Book is packed full of creative ideas for creating fun, safe, vibrant communities – inspired projects carried out by real people – that run the gamut from printing up neighborhood T-shirts, to (literally) tearing down backyard fences, to creating enjoyable public places in local cemeteries.  Many of the projects in the Great Neighborhood Book are very low-cost, sustainable, and use only local resources and the brainpower of community members.
One example: the Meridian Hill community in Washington, DC, made efforts to improve the usability of its local park, which had a dangerous reputation.  The community organized a simple, inexpensive park cleanup, filling over 400 bags with trash.  Motivated by this success, the group went on to organize a series of arts events in the park.  Within a few years, park crime had dropped by 95 percent, and park use quadrupled!
The Internet also holds lots of promise to help communities create real connections and share local knowledge. Check out Placeblogger’s network of local blogs, or EveryBlock’s news feed of information about your city.  You can also share your best community placemaking ideas, stories, and questions by joining the Great Neighborhoods group at The Placemaking Movement, PPS’s own social network for placemakers.
It's not hard to get to know your neighbors

It's not hard to get to know your neighbors

Do-it-yourself placemaking in your community makes good economic and environmental sense – but even more importantly, it helps you create a truly great place you’ll be proud to call home.

Categories: Blog, Placemaker Profiles
Tags:





June 17th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

GREAT PUBLIC SPACES: Zanzibar Old Town Market (Zanzibar, Tanzania)

Posted by: Craig Raphael

What: A thriving market with an incomparable mix of architecture and cultures.

Why it Works: The Zanzibar Old Town Market is a classic Swahili public space, mixing architectural and cultural influences from East Africa, Arabia, Persia, and India. Rather than the open-plan “plaza” of Western societies, descended from the Forum, the heritage of the Zanzibar market is the “Casbah” or “bazaar.” Thus, the market winds along dense city streets bracketed by the tall sandstone and white coral-wash mercantile buildings indigenous to the Swahili coast. The market is daily thriving with people seeking supplies for household board, from equatorial fruits to grains, fish, vegetables, and the famous spices. There are several different markets nestled throughout Zanzibar Old Town: some specialize in fresh-caught seafood, others in household wares, used clothes, local and imported cloth, jewlry, crafts, and tourist goods. The market defines civic sociability in a culture with very firm separations between private and public spaces. Zanzibar Old Town Market is a superior public arena because it is busy, industrious, purposeful, and valuable to people in the everyday conduct of life in the town.

Read the entire profile here.

Click here to nominate your favorite public space!

Categories: Blog, Great Public Spaces, Markets, Transportation





June 17th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

PPS Workshop Inspires Bold Action in Blind River

Posted by: Craig Raphael

A mural of Blind River from the downtown area

Contributed by Mandy Johnson

On May 14th, Cynthia Nikitin of PPS keynoted the Ontarians Walking Now workshop in Blind River, Ontario. Shortly after the workshop, the Blind River attendees put together a plan to make a beautiful but desolate beach in a central part of the town one of ten great places to visit and walk to. The recommendation was taken to Town Council and accepted pending a budget review of the costs. A factor in the success of the proposal was the fact that five of the key decision makers, including the mayor, attended the OWN workshop and were so inspired by Cynthia’s message and the concept of “The Power of Ten.”

The proposal includes providing picnic benches (to be built by local students enrolled in a carpentry program), garbage cans, signage, washroom facilities and a stewardshp program to provide ongoing care and maintenance.

Blind River is a small picturesque town situated on the North Channel (atop of Lake Huron) mid-way between Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury. Ontarians Walking Now (OWN) is a project of Green Communities Canada with the goal of promoting the importance of walkable communties (www.canadawalks.ca) and providing community stakeholders with the motivation, tools, and resources to effect local change.

More information:
Possible Upgrades to Fourth Sand Beach

Categories: Blog, Downtowns, Placemaker Profiles, Waterfronts





June 16th, 2009 | Go to Placemaking Blog Home

Improving Transit “By Any Means Necessary”

Posted by: joshkent

Malcolm X once said that “Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today.” And so we found ourselves in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn at the first annual Bedford-Stuyvesant Malcolm X celebration, as guests of the Malcolm X Merchants Association (MXMA). We were there to educate ourselves about the community’s experience using mass transit in their neighborhood, with the intention of improving the transit service in the community by equipping local stakeholders with tools to influence the transit planning process.

When people think of the neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant, or Bed-Stuy as it’s better known, transit may not be the first thing that comes to mind. But as with many other urban centers, transit was a key factor in its development, growth, and sustenance.

In 1888, the Fulton Street Elevated line, operated by the Kings County Elevated Railway (KCERy), began operation. It connected the Fulton Ferry with Bed-Stuy. The next large transit infrastructure project was the development of the A subway line, which connected Harlem with Bed-Stuy. The new subway line led to an exodus of African-Americans from overcrowded Harlem to Bed-Stuy. From that point on, the neighborhood has grown into one of the most vibrant in the Brooklyn metropolis.

Bed-Stuy is now served by the A and C subway lines at the Utica Avenue, Kingston-Throop Avenue, and Nostrand Avenue subway stations, the B46 and B25 bus lines, and the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR). An extensive list of services compared to many other American communities. But is that translating into quality service for the travelers to and from Bed-Stuy?

The statistics tell us that the Utica Ave. subway station, which is at the intersection of Fulton Ave. and Utica Ave., on the A and C lines, carried 4.46 million passengers in 2008, making it the 101st busiest station out of 422 in the City. And although we don’t have a count for how many bus passengers board the B46 at that intersection, we know that the B46 carried 17.3 million riders in 2008, giving it the second highest ridership out of all NYC’s bus lines.  While these numbers are impressive, they don’t tell us the full story of transit service in Bed-Stuy. They don’t explain how and why people use transit, and what improvements could be made to accommodate even more users, and perhaps more importantly, to make the community a better place.

Before we get into the survey process and the results of the survey, I should describe the basis of this project. It is part of a Federal Transit Administration research grant intended to develop tools for public participation in transit-dependent communities. PPS has been working in two pilot study sites, one in LA’s Byzantine Latino Quarter and the other in Brooklyn’s Bed-Stuy neighborhood. Local stakeholders, community activists and merchants have been meeting over the past few months to try out some of these tools. In Bed-Stuy, PPS has worked with the Malcolm X Merchant’s Association and Bridge Street Development Corporation (BSDC) to hold workshops and focus groups that will pilot our public participation tools and, simultaneously, create a community vision for Malcolm X Boulevard and Utica Avenue Plaza.

We went to the Malcolm X festival to gather the type of qualitative information that traffic reports often lack. We set up a table on Malcolm X Avenue, in between a vendor selling homemade earrings, and another vendor selling very random trinkets, with the hope that a few interested people would stop by. We had with us two tools to understand the community’s interpretation of their transit service — one was a short survey regarding the quality of pedestrian journeys, and the other was a large neighborhood aerial for a Destination and Route Mapping exercise. The survey had basic questions that we used to determine people’s destinations, preferred paths, and thoughts on how transit stops could be improved. The map was used to determine positive and negative areas in the community, as well as the paths people chose to get to or avoid those places and why.

Before we knew it, our table was swarmed with community members. The wealth of nuance that they gave us was tremendous. Many of the participants in our research had been living in the community their whole lives and their family histories go back several generations. That’s no small measure in a city as transient as New York City! They described their streets down to the most minor detail, as if they knew them like the back of their hands. “Don’t go down Stuyvesant between Bainbridge and Chauncy after dark because it’s not lit well enough,” one woman said. Another woman spoke of the well-kept landscaping on Decatur between Malcolm X and Patchen. “What about that wine bar opening up on Lewis?” “I don’t like those drug dealers on Fulton,” “There’s Solomon’s Porch on Stuyvesant!” People were blurting out things left and right. Within a few hours our map was filled with green and red dots, and we had 25 completed surveys in our back pocket.

Many community members are not involved in the transit planning process, and as a result, transit service is not catered to their needs. Instead, it is designed to meet the parochial benchmarks of transportation engineers – “level of service” and so on and so forth. But “level of service” isn’t always the best measure for level of service; it doesn’t consider the café down the block that people might want to walk by in the morning to get coffee, or the fact that a vacant block across the bus stop might attract seedy characters. Our pilot project is intended to understand the reality of a community’s transit needs, and equip them with tools to influence transit service to it adapts to that reality – a bottom-up approach, not a top-down approach that we’ve seen far too often.

During our research the community’s main concern regarding their transit experience was safety. Participants mentioned fear of crime in places where certain infrastructure such as lighting was missing. Nevertheless, there was a clear sense of neighborhood pride that people shared. The community spoke with confidence that the streets were theirs, and there was always a glimmer of confidence in their words that they were restoring their community from an era where it suffered greatly from crime, poverty, and political neglect. With the tools that we are helping to develop for Bed-Stuy, and eventually, other transit-dependent communities, we can play a role in empowering them to improve their journey from point A to point B. We want everyone dancing while they wait for the bus, like this gentleman waiting for the B25 in Utica Plaza.

Categories: Blog, Building Communities through Transportation, Placemaker Profiles, Project Updates, Squares, Transportation